As a test, I entered our training slides into an AI program to generate an interview style overview. Therer are a couple of glaring instances where the AI got things very wrong — especially regarding the visual component of our scoring — but this is pretty interesting.
Below is the unedited result.
1:13: Although most of our books have a military theme, it’s not true that we only accept those types of books.
3:15: Not an accurate accounting of our visual scoring criteria. What they describe DOES belong in the content and/or style sections. Our visual scoring is concerned mostly with layout (font, margins, etc.) and art (cover art and content, plus photos and illustrations, if applicable).
Sections covering reviewers, reviewer conferences, and reviews are pretty well done—although most of the comments are focused on fiction genres.
13:00: Starts to muddle the distinction between reviews and feedback.
14:58: The e-book section is a little convoluted:
There was no prior mention of the reviewer recognition program (Amazon gift cards)
“Secret Literary Exchange Program”? What?