An AI interpretation of our reviewer slides

As a test, I entered our training slides into an AI program to generate an interview style overview. Therer are a couple of glaring instances where the AI got things very wrong — especially regarding the visual component of our scoring — but this is pretty interesting.

Below is the unedited result.

  • 1:13: Although most of our books have a military theme, it’s not true that we only accept those types of books.

  • 3:15: Not an accurate accounting of our visual scoring criteria. What they describe DOES belong in the content and/or style sections. Our visual scoring is concerned mostly with layout (font, margins, etc.) and art (cover art and content, plus photos and illustrations, if applicable).

  • Sections covering reviewers, reviewer conferences, and reviews are pretty well done—although most of the comments are focused on fiction genres.

  • 13:00: Starts to muddle the distinction between reviews and feedback.

  • 14:58: The e-book section is a little convoluted:

    • There was no prior mention of the reviewer recognition program (Amazon gift cards)

    • “Secret Literary Exchange Program”? What?